- Does non-kosher food "contaminate" us?
 
        -  
 
        - Written by student of Rabbi Reuben Mann - Dean, Masoret Institute
 
         
        - There are many different explanations of kashrus. One of the popular
 
        - views out there is the theory that certain animals such as pig or
          other non
 
        - kosher animals are inherently bad and disgusting and therefore G-d
          prohibited
 
        - us from eating them. This view contends that if one eats the
          prohibited
 
        - foods, something intrinsic in the food would cause "spiritual
          blockades" to
 
        - be set up in a person, and will impair his abilities to get closer
          to G-d.
 
        - This they say is one of the many reasons for kashrus.
 
        -  
 
        - Before we get to a proper understanding of kashrus it is imperative
 
        - for us to see why this idea does not hold true in Judaism. The
          source often
 
        - quoted by this school of thought is in Tractate Yoma 39a which
          states, "The
 
        - house of Rabbi Yishmael taught, sin dulls the heart of man" and
          he adduces it
 
        - from the portion in the Torah dealing with kashrus. Many people
          mistakenly
 
        - interpret that as meaning that non kosher food dulls the heart and
          even go a
 
        - step further and say it actually "contaminates" the soul.
          But upon a careful
 
        - reading we see it only refers to sin.
 
        -  
 
        - Besides this egregious interpretation, the sources in Judaism go
 
        - against such a notion. In Deuteronomy 6:11 we read that when the
          Jewish
 
        - people enter the land of Israel they will find homes filled with all
          kinds of
 
        - good things which they will be able to partake of. The oral law
          identifies
 
        - these good things as inclusive of foodstuffs, even pig. The people
          were
 
        - permitted upon entering the land to consume all prohibited foods
          they find at
 
        - the time. The Bible, interestingly enough, refers to these very
          prohibited
 
        - foods as "good." Thus even though the Torah prohibited
          certain foods they are
 
        - not considered "bad." The prohibition is merely to teach
          man to exercise
 
        - control over his appetitive desires not that there is anything
          "unclean"
 
        - about a pig or camel or horse. G-d does not, so to speak, like the
          cow more
 
        - than the donkey. They are all equal His creation. In a similar vein
          the
 
        - Rabbis of the Talmud have stated (check Rashi in Leviticus 20:26),
          "Do not
 
        - say, I dislike the flesh of the pig, but rather, I like it but God
          has
 
        - decreed that I abstain from it." If one abstains from pig
          because he thinks
 
        - it is "bad" in some sense, he is functioning on a
          primitive taboo level not
 
        - on the level which G-d has prescribed for him so that he gain
          perfection as a
 
        - human being.
 
        -  
 
        - In fact there is a halacha, that under certain circumstances, if non
 
        - kosher food was mixed with kosher food, one is allowed to eat from
          the
 
        - mixture. Now if there was something inherently wrong with the food,
          and if
 
        - it really did contaminate the soul, how would the Rabbis of the
          Talmud allow
 
        - one to eat from the mixture? Another halachic proof against the
          spiritual
 
        - contamination theory is the prohibition of eating a meat and milk
          mixture.
 
        - This is the most stringent of the prohibited foods. Yet is made up
          of 2
 
        - permitted objects. When they are cooked together they become assur.
          Do we
 
        - maintain that the cooking process creates a new chemical which
          contaminates
 
        - the heart? Another interesting proof can be found in Rashi on
          Vayikra18:4 And
 
        - my Chukos you shall keep.... Rashi explains, "Things which are
          a decree of
 
        - the king and the yetzer hara rejects saying why should we keep them
          like
 
        - eating pig and wearing shaatnes, etc." Hence Rashi puts pig in
          the same
 
        - category as shaatnes in the sense that no reason can be found for
          prohibiting
 
        - the particular object. If however negative consequences come from
          eating pig
 
        - whether spiritual or physical then the yetzer hara should not
          object. It is
 
        - thus clear that Rashi did not believe that pig contains any harmful
          quality.
 
        -  
 
        - Besides all this one really cannot understand the idea. Why would
 
        - G-d create such animals if they were inherently bad to begin with?
          If these
 
        - foods do indeed contaminate ones soul and bar one from perceiving
          holiness,
 
        - then how is it that Judaism has converts? One could say that since
          these
 
        - converts ate these foods their soul is contaminated. Yet, converts
          have been
 
        - among the top scholars in Jewish history who reached high levels of
 
        - perfection (Onkleus, Shemaya, Avtalyon, etc.). What about our
          forefather
 
        - Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? They weren't bound by kashrus laws, but
          were their
 
        - souls contaminated? Did the Jews in Egypt all possess contaminated
          souls
 
        - because they ate non kosher food? Maybe this idea is what really
 
        - contaminates the heart not non kosher food.
 
        -  
 
        - Judaism fosters a system where one control his instinctual desires
 
        - such as appetite. The appetitive part of man is a strong force and
          must be
 
        - controlled. Part of Judaism is that man should live in a system
          where his
 
        - soul and rational component are in control. Based on this, G-d
          created a
 
        - system of kashrus. In other words, kashrus wasn't designed to
          prevent people
 
        - from contaminating their hearts from foods which are supposedly
          inherently
 
        - bad. Rather, it was a system designed to control man's appetitive
          component.
 
        - Based on this, the Torah went ahead and prohibited certain foods.
          The
 
        - Rambam states that one of the reasons most domesticated animals are
          kosher,
 
        - while undomesticated others aren't, is because of practical
          purposes. If G-d
 
        - prohibited cattle and permitted only lions and tigers it would be
          much harder
 
        - to eat meat. G-d gave a system in which man can live by. Therefore,
          from
 
        - the Rambam one can infer that really there is really nothing
          inherently bad
 
        - about the food. Kashrus is there to teach us about control. In fact
          Rashi,
 
        - in his commentary to Leviticus 11;44 states that when the Torah says
          one
 
        - should not make his soul impure by eating creatures that creep on
          the earth,
 
        - the impurity referred to is obtained by transgressing G-d's
          commandment.
 
        - Thus we see that the contamination of the soul does not come about
          through
 
        - any specific food, rather it's based on the fact that man
          transgresses one of
 
        - G-d's commandments. One who lives a lifestyle whereby he doesn't
          listen to
 
        - G-d and does not control his instinctual desires is the one who is
          truly
 
        - contaminated.
 
       
     |